Fwd: Transitions Completed
Hello, dak is configured to send the Release Team a mail each time one
of the "transition blocks" expires because the transition has been
completed.
I thought it could perhaps be a good idea to CC them to -devel. Does
somebody think we shouldn't do that? (I'd send a patch to include the
name of the transition in the Subject.)
Cheers,
----- Forwarded message from Debian Installer <installer@ftp-master.debian.org> -----
From: Debian Installer <installer@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 15:28:29 +0000
Subject: Transitions Completed
The following transitions are complete and have been removed
from the transitions list:
The following transitions were removed:
Looking at transition: gnome
Source: gnome-desktop
New Version: 2.26.1-1
Responsible: Adeodato Simo
Description: GNOME transition almost ready
Blocked Packages (total: 79): avant-window-navigator, awn-extras-applets, banshee, beagle, blam, brasero, control-center, deskbar-applet, desktop-data-model, dfo, eiciel, eog, epiphany-browser, epiphany-extensions, epiphany-extensions-more, evolution, evolution-data-server, evolution-exchange, f-spot, file-roller, galeon, gbrainy, gedit-plugins, gfax, giver, gksu, gnome-applets, gnome-desktop, gnome-desktop-sharp2, gnome-do, gnome-do-plugins, gnome-launch-box, gnome-mag, gnome-main-menu, gnome-mount, gnome-panel, gnome-python-desktop, gnome-rdp, gnome-screensaver, gnome-settings-daemon, gnome-sharp2, gnome-subtitles, gnome-system-tools, gnome-utils, gshare, gtkhtml3.14, gtranslator, gtwitter, gucharmap, hipo, last-exit, lat, libepc, libgnomekbd, meta-gnome2, monodevelop, monodevelop-boo, monodevelop-database, monodevelop-debugger-gdb, monodevelop-java, monodevelop-vala, muine, nautilus, nautilus-actions, nautilus-cd-burner, nautilus-open-terminal, nautilus-python, nautilus-sendto, quick-lounge-applet, rhythmbox, seahorse-plugins, shared-mime-info, smuxi, stardict, tasque, tomboy, totem, totem-pl-parser, tracker
----- End forwarded message -----
--
- Are you sure we're good?
- Always.
-- Rory and Lorelai
Reply to: