Re: RFC: Better formatting for long descriptions
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> - Ability to recognize and render the following logical entities, in
> decreasing order of importance:
> + unordered lists
> + ordered lists
really needed?
> + emphasis
> + strong emphasis
> + definition lists
> + hypertext links
> + underlines, and strike throughs
I don't think they are needed. Underlines is generally bad,
strike throughs are worse ;-)
Ev. also monospace, e.g. for commands, but I really prefer to have
a simpler language as possible.
> At this point, I would say that Markdown/Resstructued text meets
> most of the goals above, as long as we restrict the markup to the list
> above:
Could provide us an example of Resstructued for the basic constructs?
> * unordered lists
> * ordered lists
> * emphasis
> * strong emphasis
> * definition lists
> * hypertext links
> * underlines, and strike throughs
I like also creole (standardized wiki language, moinmoin support it), but no definition lists,
underline, strike throughs.
So for creole:
* unordered lists \n * \n **
* ordered lists \n # \n ##
* emphasis //foo//
* strong emphasis **bar**
* definition lists missing ev. \n **spam** is spam
* hypertext links normal url
* underlines, and strike throughs missing, missing
ciao
cate
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAknnhU8ACgkQ+ZNUJLHfmlfJigCfR/Jpn96l7FxHb9INlJlHkd+S
z+MAn2eM+rOOHN9n8LJTYXi/gT7cWuMa
=3a5+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: