Re: [Amendment] Reaffirm the GR process
* Kurt Roeckx [Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:52:22 +0100]:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 08:03:46PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > I'd also like to complain about the title text of the initial GR. It is
> > clearly manipulative, as it pretends to be merely describing the proposed
> > changes when in fact it is asserting an opinion. I hope the Secretary
> > will fix this.
> I think the title is also not the best one and just used Joerg's
> What about:
> General Resolution sponsorship requirements
I’d suggest a minor variation: “Sponsorship requirements for General
- Are you sure we're good?
-- Rory and Lorelai