Re: problems with the concept of unstable -> testing

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: problems with the concept of unstable -> testing
From: "Paul Wise" <pabs@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:55:24 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] e13a36b30812212255g62584c6dhbff9565edf686e20@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1E8BC2F9-7665-4186-ACFF-79AD914617E1@bioxray.au.dk>
References: <[🔎] 200812160703.00258.russell@coker.com.au> <[🔎] 20081215202550.GB31383@debian.org> <[🔎] 1E8BC2F9-7665-4186-ACFF-79AD914617E1@bioxray.au.dk>

On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 6:08 AM, Kjeldgaard Morten
<mortenkjeldgaard@gmail.com> wrote:

> Another model that I think has not been discussed is never freezing stable.

Freezing is the whole point of stable, if we didn't freeze it, it has
no reason to exist.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: problems with the concept of unstable -> testing
  - From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>

References:
- problems with the concept of unstable -> testing
  - From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
- Re: problems with the concept of unstable -> testing
  - From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
- Re: problems with the concept of unstable -> testing
  - From: Kjeldgaard Morten <mortenkjeldgaard@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: "Debian women may leave due to 'sexist' post"
Next by Date: Re: problems with the concept of unstable -> testing
Previous by thread: Re: problems with the concept of unstable -> testing
Next by thread: Re: problems with the concept of unstable -> testing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread