Re: problems with the concept of unstable -> testing

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: problems with the concept of unstable -> testing
From: Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:17:13 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20081216211713.GP15502@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] gi930n$1ub$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <[🔎] 200812160703.00258.russell@coker.com.au> <[🔎] gi6hf1$292$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] gi6itl$7pc$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] gi6jk1$a1u$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] gi6jk1$a1u$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] E1LCftL-0002Cu-Kg@jack.mossbank.org.uk> <[🔎] gi930n$1ub$1@ger.gmane.org>

On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 09:27:55PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Actually, I don't know since I'm not long enough involved to know what
> happened "back then". 

It's called research.


Michael

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: problems with the concept of unstable -> testing
  - From: Noah Slater <nslater@tumbolia.org>

References:
- problems with the concept of unstable -> testing
  - From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
- Re: problems with the concept of unstable -> testing
  - From: Bastian Venthur <venthur@debian.org>
- Re: problems with the concept of unstable -> testing
  - From: Didier Raboud <didier@raboud.com>
- Re: problems with the concept of unstable -> testing
  - From: Bastian Venthur <venthur@debian.org>
- Re: problems with the concept of unstable -> testing
  - From: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
- Re: problems with the concept of unstable -> testing
  - From: Bastian Venthur <venthur@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: problems with the concept of unstable -> testing
Next by Date: Re: problems with the concept of unstable -> testing
Previous by thread: Re: problems with the concept of unstable -> testing
Next by thread: Re: problems with the concept of unstable -> testing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread