Re: Packages still depending on GTK+ 1.2

To: William Pitcock <nenolod@sacredspiral.co.uk>
Cc: Klaus Ethgen <Klaus@Ethgen.de>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Packages still depending on GTK+ 1.2
From: "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <jackyf.devel@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:24:53 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 493D3C45.7040001@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1228746531.30808.156.camel@petrie>
References: <[🔎] 1228500386.4194.149.camel@shizuru> <[🔎] 20081206194217.GA13703@ikki.ethgen.de> <[🔎] 1228746531.30808.156.camel@petrie>

William Pitcock wrote:
> Unless you're talking about the ugly XMMS GUI. In which case, I believe
> QMMS is available for packaging.
You meant 'QMMP'? It reproduces XMMS GUI and it is in unstable already.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
Ukrainian C++ Developer, Debian APT contributor

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Packages still depending on GTK+ 1.2
  - From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: Packages still depending on GTK+ 1.2
  - From: Klaus Ethgen <Klaus@Ethgen.de>
- Re: Packages still depending on GTK+ 1.2
  - From: William Pitcock <nenolod@sacredspiral.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Bug#508169: ITP: bmakiosk -- Iceweasel/Firefox kiosk extension
Next by Date: Re: Packages still depending on GTK+ 1.2
Previous by thread: Re: Packages still depending on GTK+ 1.2
Next by thread: Re: Packages still depending on GTK+ 1.2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread