Re: NEW processing
Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org> writes:
> I don't understand the logical connection here. IMO, NEW processing should
> be a rubber stamp, with only the checking required to satisfy whatever our
> needs are for liability purposes.
In my relatively short experience even the legalese check is
definitely NOT rubber stamping, considering how many NEW packages fail
licensing/copyright checks...
--
* Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) *
* PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer *
Reply to: