Re: qmail and related packages in NEW
* Bernd Eckenfels:
> In article <[🔎] 873ah8x91t.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> you wrote:
>> Personally, I'm more concerned about manual constant propagation in
>> some parts of the code base (like using the integer literal 4 for the
>> size of an IPv4 address), and similar coding style issues. But this
>> is certainly not restricted to qmail (Bernstein's DNS code suffers
>> from that to a higher degree, and it's in the archive).
>
> Well, do you think the size of ipv4 addresses ever will change? :)
Ask the poor guys who wrote IPv6 patches for djbdns.
Reply to: