Re: call for seconds: on firmware
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> The proposers and sponsors of option 5 didn't propose this as an amendment
>> to the current GR. Why should they have to *withdraw* the proposal in order
>> to get it considered separately at a later time?
>
> They only need to do so to prevent it from being on the current
> ballot. I think it would be a pity of any of the 6 options is
> withdrawn, since any of them could lend us relief from the current mess
> wrt Lenny release.
Why?
The option was proposed as GR on it's own and it was seconded this way.
Even if I can see where you're coming from in merging it into the "current" GR,
that's not what was asked for. Do we now need a GR to tell the secretary that a
proposed and seconded GR should not be merged into other GRs?
--
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
GPG Fingerprint: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79
Reply to: