Re: Should selinux be standard?
On Mon, Sep 15 2008, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 06:12:03PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>>> Le lundi 15 septembre 2008 à 10:12 -0500, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
>>> > > Agreed. Either SELinux is suitable with our default setup and we
>>> > > should enable it by default to get all its alleged benefits, or it is
>>> > > not, and we should simply not install it.
>>> > Since the new default policy seems to be working in targeted
>>> > mode, I think we are doing fine.
>>> Fine. Then let’s enable it by default.
>> Oh yeah. Do you intend to do the support?
> If it is not very functional by default, or it is but nobody is
> willing to support it, then it shouldn't be standard; that's the main
If it is not functional, there should be bugs filed, no?
Don't hate yourself in the morning -- sleep till noon.
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C