Le dimanche 18 mai 2008 à 00:29 +0200, Pierre Habouzit a écrit : > And I believe the "automation" of sending bugs upstream unsolvable, > because I tried to solve it, and failed. Of course, when upstream is > Mailing-list driven this is easy. But when your upstream is KDE (or > glibc, or ..) that uses a bugzilla with subprojects, components and so > on, before even _thinking_ of filing a bug, you have to file half a > dozen of fields to document where your patch should go. And _this_ is > painful, and _this_ is why so few bugs are forwarded upstream. I don’t think upstream developers are separating their giant projects in subprojects and components just to annoy us. When a component like nautilus has, as of today, 1809 open bugs, the very least we can do to ease their work is to categorize them. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=