On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 07:06:52PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:56:01 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > This certainly good. However, perhaps dak should have been changed to > > accept both format versions (1.7 and 1.8), instead of just rejecting the > > old one right away. This could have been continued until some fixed > > time after the release of Lenny. > > dak doesn't reject Format: 1.7 changes files (it still needs to accept > packages built for stable, if nothing else). However it rejects Format: > 1.8 changes files where the checksums don't match, which is what happens > if you build with sid's dpkg-dev but use a debsign that doesn't know > about the new checksums and doesn't update them. > OK. My mistake. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature