[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposing a new source control header to link to upstream BTSs



On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:01:30 +0000, Neil Williams wrote:

> > I appreciate the strive to make Debian work on small machines, but it
> > is reasonable to put their constraints on the whole project?
> IMHO the Packages.gz file is already too large for my standard Debian
> machines! 

I see this point and I agree to it.

Maybe a better place for Tincho's idea would be an (optional)
debian/bugtracker file (similar to debian/watch).

FWIW: The idea of being able to type "bts forward 123456" (instead of
forward_ed_) sounds really appealing to me. Or an equivalent to uscan
like 'ubts'. (And it would need some additional local config for
credentials for upstream bug trackers etc.)

Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/
   `-    NP: Larimar: Drive

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: