Re: broken .orig.tar.gz (Re: package upload rejected - no email)
Clint Adams <email@example.com> writes:
> I'm not convinced that the majority of these uncaught problems are
> significant enough to worry about. I would be surprised, for example,
> if using a non-pristine tarball was ever regarded as a release-critical
> Why slow down NEW processing to check things like that?
This is a valid point. I tend to be perfectionist, probably too much so.
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>