Re: Idea for package name instead of "build" (ITP)
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 07:30:37PM +0100, David Bremner wrote:
> >>>>> "Raphael" == Raphael Bossek <bossekr@debian.org> writes:
>
>
> Raphael> Now I'm looking for a idea how to name the "build"
> Raphael> package. For my perspective of view is "build" to simple
> Raphael> to be packaged as it is. My idea was to sue the first
> Raphael> letters (forename, surname) of the developer,
> Raphael> e.g. bkbuild.
>
> Since it seems to generate makefiles, I suggest Automake :-)
>
> But, slightly more seriously "mentioning" Gnu Make might also be a
> possibility: e.g. gmbuild or mkbuild or makebuild or mfbuild.
It's unclear to me what your answer has to do with the question.
AFAICT, Raphael was asking for feedback on how to name some random build
system with the pretty generic name `build', and you recommended some
alternatives instead.
Michael
Reply to: