Re: List of packages shipping shell scripts with bashisms + MBF proposal
"Adam D. Barratt" <email@example.com> writes:
> lintian's parsing code certainly sounds better (mainly because
> checkbashisms is based on an old version of the lintian code) but, from
> a quick look, checkbashisms flags more issues than lintian does. We do
> appear to be missing a few though; I'll have a look at getting them back
> in sync.
I'd definitely welcome any additional regexes or code to add to lintian.
(And at some point we can figure out how to keep this in sync with less
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>