Re: Bug#462027: ITP: libactiverecord-ruby -- library that ties database tables to classes in Ruby
Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 09:35:06PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
>> Have you spoken with the rails package maintainer about this and your
>> other ITP? Having duplicate copies of the same code lying around in
>> the archive is something the security team has said they are actively
>> discouraging. Splitting these out from the rails package seems like
>> the smarter way to go.
> As a complete third-party, I'd be mildly interested in having
> activerecord as a separate package from rails in it's entirety.
Why? What is the disadvantage of having it together with rails? I'm
assuming 7MB of diskspace (2MB archive) is not what is your main reason.