Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> On 02/01/2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>> Though after a second thought, -dbg should probably not have empty
>> Depends line.
> After a third thought, I still fail to see what that has to do with
> being Architecture: all or any.
Quoting my self (first message):
> This is usually bug either because of a missing Depends or because the
> package should be Architecture: all.
Atomo64 - Raphael
Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.