Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:38:32PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hello Kurt,
>
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:17:24PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> I've written a script which tries to detect packages which should
> >> be
> >> architecture all based on the fact that they don't contain a
> >> Depends
> >> field.
> >
> > Your list seems to contain alot of packages that do have a Depends
> > field.
>
> Like which one? I used a lot of grepping so maybe something was left
> in.
As already pointed out by some others, you should list the binary
packages instead of the source packages. It's rather confusing like
this.
> Anibal Avelar (Fixxxer) <aavelar@cofradia.org>
> centerim
That should be centerim-common
> Loic Dachary (OuoU) <loic@debian.org>
> unittest++ (U)
libunittest++0
> Johan Euphrosine (proppy) <proppy@aminche.com>
> unittest++
libunittest++0
> Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
> gss (U)
libgss-dbg, false positive
> shishi (U)
shishi-dbg, false positive
Kurt
Reply to: