Le dimanche 09 décembre 2007 à 15:44 -0800, Steve Langasek a écrit : > > For example, pkg-config --libs gtk+-x11-2.0 will return, among others, > > -lglib-2.0 and -lm. And this is perfectly intentional. > > Just because it's intentional doesn't mean it isn't absurd and wrong. It may be absurd, but I don’t think it is wrong. > No, what can be done is to fix upstream's broken declaration that 'you can > assume glib functions are available when doing "#include <gtk/gtk.h>"'. It > doesn't follow that just because this works in practice, it should be a > supported usage. When many of the types used by GTK+ are those provided by GLib, it sounds wrong to ask developers to include the GLib headers to have these types available. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=