El vie, 07-12-2007 a las 10:57 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz escribió: > > * License : MIT > > hmm, on a fast look trough the tarball all I found was > - a LICENSE file, with a license from Apple > - a COPYING file, with a license which seems to be written by squeak > (starts pretty ugly, didn't read it, though). > - a COPYRIGHT file which contains the GPL2 > > and no license information at all in the randeom ~10 source files I > looked into. > > Looks like http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package is still > correct - but it would be a good thing to convince upstream to fix that. > I'm afraid you've looked at the version 3.9-8 whose tarball is available at the official web page. My plan is package 3.9-12 (available through svn) that has fixed those files. Cheers. BTW: Upstream is totally convinced.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente