On 23 Oct 2007, at 15:04, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
ti, 2007-10-23 kello 12:35 +0100, Matthew Vernon kirjoitti:The Authorized Version of the Bible isn't covered by Copyright in the conventional sense. The Queen's Printer (currently Cambridge University Press) has an exclusive commercial right to print the AV (and the BCP, but that's not relevant here) in EnglandWould not a restriction on commercial use still be against the DFSG, andthe package therefore be problematic?
It's not quite that simple. You can't print and sell Bibles in the UK (unless you are CUP or OUP). Would a bomb-making text in Debian be non-free because the UK forbids you to print and sell it?
Matthew -- Matthew Vernon MA VetMB LGSM MRCVS Farm Animal Epidemiology and Informatics Unit Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge http://www.cus.cam.ac.uk/~mcv21/