Re: Handling of poorly maintained and useless packages

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Handling of poorly maintained and useless packages
From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:46:22 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 200710131046.23309.holger@layer-acht.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20071013072237.GA7110@artemis.corp>
References: <[🔎] 20071012071311.GA11380@xanadu.blop.info> <[🔎] fepb22$q7r$2@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 20071013072237.GA7110@artemis.corp>

Hi,

On Saturday 13 October 2007 09:22, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>   Perfect example of a useless buggy package in debian. Anyone needing
> dak uses the svn snapshot because the one in the archive is old and
> deprecated.

I think you are on a wrong track here. It might be an example of a poorly 
maintained package. But it would be very useful if anybody needing it could 
just install the latest and greatest package without needing to go to svn.

regards,
	Holger

Attachment: pgpiTxJTtQap9.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Handling of poorly maintained and useless packages
  - From: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>

References:
- Handling of poorly maintained and useless packages
  - From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>
- Re: Handling of poorly maintained and useless packages
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
- Re: Handling of poorly maintained and useless packages
  - From: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Handling of poorly maintained and useless packages
Next by Date: Re: Handling of poorly maintained and useless packages
Previous by thread: Re: Handling of poorly maintained and useless packages
Next by thread: Re: Handling of poorly maintained and useless packages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread