Re: Handling of poorly maintained and useless packages
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Some additional info might also be useful:
>> - age of last upload
>> - WNPP status (O, RFH, RFA) (for how long?)
>> - Maintainer's MIA status
>> - number of packages maintained by the maintainer
>> - number of maintainers for the package
>> - is the package team maintained?
>
> - are there better maintained packages with similar functionality?
>
- - upstream status: dead, unresponsive, very active (since useless
packages can become useful very fast in the case of new software),
normal, etc
ACK to all the rest.
Cheers
- --
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHD2BbImLTb3rflGYRAhfNAKC/bJM9rbdU+DHc4g1UUp5J8TqeDgCeK2fW
PYUh93wWg7B6hRcd2M6GsNc=
=j9bE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: