Le vendredi 12 octobre 2007 à 09:13 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > This mail tries to address the problem of not orphaned, poorly maintained > or useless packages in Debian. The proposal below tries to address both > cases, because they are often related. (useless packages tend to be poorly > maintained, and vice-versa). I couldn't agree more. Such a process can only improve the quality of Debian as a whole. > Some additional info might also be useful: > - age of last upload > - WNPP status (O, RFH, RFA) (for how long?) > - Maintainer's MIA status > - number of packages maintained by the maintainer > - number of maintainers for the package > - is the package team maintained? - are there better maintained packages with similar functionality? -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org `. `' joss@debian.org `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=