Re: Handling of poorly maintained and useless packages
On 2007-10-12, Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net> wrote:
[snip]
full ack to whatever you wrote here - and thank you for your nice work
with this.
> It's important to decide on reasonable delays.
> - If the procedure takes too long, it will be discouraging
I think that your proposed "times" falls slightly into this category.
> - If the procedure is too short, decisions will be contested
> I think that the following makes sense:
> - For packages where orphaning was proposed: 50 days
1 month
At least in cases where there is interested people in taking over, I
think we need to be able to move "faster" than 50 days.
> - For packages where removal was proposed: 100 days
2 month
(But this one is not that important)
> So, what do you think about that? Any proposed changes?
/Sune
Reply to: