[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: seeking: Ian Jackson



also sprach Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> [2007.10.10.1145 +0100]:
> RFC 1123 contains this requirement:
> 
>       5.2.2  Canonicalization: RFC-821 Section 3.1
> 
>          The domain names that a Sender-SMTP sends in MAIL and RCPT
>          commands MUST have been  "canonicalized," i.e., they must be
>          fully-qualified principal names or domain literals, not
>          nicknames or domain abbreviations.  A canonicalized name either
>          identifies a host directly or is an MX name; it cannot be a
>          CNAME.
> 
> This means that it's fine to use domains pointing to CNAMEs in Internet
> mail. 

I think it says exactly the opposite, don't you?

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
if loving linux is wrong, i don't want to be right.

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


Reply to: