Re: dpkg-shlibdeps and private libraries
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 11:56:39AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 11:30:27AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On the other hand, maybe I should just be less picky for shared objects
> > without SONAME... I'm not sure about it.
> I would suggest that, there are a few programs out there which use
> many internal use shlibs without a soname and a more complex
> tree of dirs to pick up their stuff than a single directory.
Also all Java JNI libraries dont use SONAMEs. I guess these can be
problematic for new dpkg-shlibdeps too.