Re: Re: GCC 4.2 transition

To: schepler@math.unipd.it
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Re: GCC 4.2 transition
From: Philippe Cloutier <philippe.cloutier.2@ulaval.ca>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:21:18 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 4684F93E.6000204@ulaval.ca>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200706281709.22493.schepler@math.unipd.it>
References: <[🔎] 200706281709.22493.schepler@math.unipd.it>

BTW: anybody more versed in the bts system than I am, how can I get #359634marked as not actually being fixed?

Does a simple reopen not work?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC 4.2 transition
  - From: Daniel Schepler <schepler@math.unipd.it>

References:
- Re: GCC 4.2 transition
  - From: Daniel Schepler <schepler@math.unipd.it>

Prev by Date: Re: Use of "Breaks" dependencies
Next by Date: FTBFS if built twice in a row
Previous by thread: Re: GCC 4.2 transition
Next by thread: Re: GCC 4.2 transition
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread