Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On jeu, 2007-06-28 at 06:24 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: >> I'm not sure if XFCE in Debian already uses >> gnome-mount, though. > > No, and we don't really want to depends on gnome stuff, especially > looking at the huge dependencies list of gnome-mount. We already use > exo-mount, which doesn't yet provide this functionality, afaik. Hi Yves-Alexis, the long list of GNOME dependencies is because of the nautilus plugin. I could either split out the nautilus plugin into a seperate package or exclude the nautilus plugin from dh_shlibdeps. As nautilus automatically provides the necessary dependencies, the latter would be an acceptable and cheap solution (and it's the one taken by our Ubuntu fellows). It would trim down the dependency list to: libc6 (>= 2.5-5), libdbus-1-3 (>= 1.1.1), libdbus-glib-1-2 (>= 0.73), libgconf2-4 (>= 2.13.5), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.12.9), libgnome-keyring0 (>= 0.8), libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.10.12-3), libhal-storage1 (>= 0.5.9), libhal1 (>= 0.5.9), libnotify1 (>= 0.4.4), libnotify1-gtk2.10, gconf2 (>= 2.10.1-2), hal, eject Would that be acceptable for you XFce guys? If you'd consider to use gnome-mount in that case I would prepare a updated version of gnome-mount. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature