Re: GCC 4.2 transition

[Daniel Schepler <schepler@math.unipd.it>]

I've been unable to reproduce any of the "One Definition Rule" bugs you filed.  
Jigdo builds fine; apt builds successfully apart from #428623 (and #359634 on 
my local setup); and gnome-vfsmm2.6 is fine until it hits #422813.  It looks 
like something was either fixed or reverted.  I also tried compiling jigdo 
using the current gcc-snapshot, and it built fine after I added some missing 
#includes.

So with your permission, I'd like to close those three bugs.

BTW: anybody more versed in the bts system than I am, how can I get #359634 
marked as not actually being fixed?  My clumsy attempts just ended up making 
things more confused.
-- 
Daniel Schepler