Em Sáb, 2007-06-23 às 12:59 +0100, Chris Lamb escreveu: > Charles Plessy wrote: > > > as said in another mail, folding@home is definitely non-free. Hovever, > > if Debian would become an "authorized distributor", the licence would be > > suitable for non-free. > > What about Debian derivatives? They would not, but that is not a problem for non-free. -- Guilherme de S. Pastore gpastore@debian.org