On 22/06/07 at 00:36 +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > Hi, > * Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net> [2007-06-22 00:17]: > > During my talk today at debconf, I discussed the idea of sending mails > > to maintainers of packages with serious problems. The audience > > welcomed the idea, so I will send the first mails soon. > > That sounds good to me! > > > You will receive a mail: > > * if one of your packages has RC bugs older than 30 days in unstable > [...] > > I plan to send such mails on a monthly basis. Depending on how well it > > is received, the criterias will be enlarged to include more packages, > > while staying reasonable. > [...] > > You will only receive one mail (per e-mail address), listing the > > problems in all your packages, not one mail per package. If all your > > packages are OK (according to the criterias above), you won't receive > > anything. > > I propose to change this a bit for RC bugs. Assume you get a > mail on 2nd of a month and get an RC bug on the 3rd day. > Then you get the mail for the RC bug nearly after 2 months > since it is not 30 days old on the 2nd of next month. I don't think this is avoidable. I have to draw the line somewhere, and someone could make the point that if I send mails on the 1st, and a bug is reported on the 10th, one will have to wait until the bug is 50 days old to receive a mail. Those mails are not supposed to supposed to replace the BTS mails, anyway! :-) > But the service seems to be a great service for maintainers > in my opinion. Thank you:) -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature