[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Using standardized SI prefixes



Am 2007-06-15 17:36:33, schrieb Ivan Jager:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, cascardo@minaslivre.org wrote:
> >Yes. But you can't infer which one (1000 or 1024) MB mean. When you buy
> >a disk, what do the vendor says the capacity is? 80 GB. But your
> >software states it is no more than 75GB. What the fuck!? If GiB is
> >confusing to users, so is base 2. People use base 10 and k (kilo) means
> >1000, M (Mega) means 10^6, G (Giga) means 10^9, etc., because they are
> >used to base 10.
> 
> How about when you buy 80 GB of RAM, and your software says you have
> 88 GB?

You are fucked too, since your 486 does
only support 67108864 Byte of ram. -- Oops!

> How about using these prefixes to unambiguously refer to powers of 10? 
> kd	kidi	10^3
> Md	meda	10^6
> Gd	gida	10^9
> Td	teda	10^12
> Pd	peda	10^15
> Ed	exda	10^18
> Zd	zeda	10^21
> Yd	yoda	10^24
> 
> Come on, you know you want a yodameter. :)

ROTFL!

Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
    Michelle Konzack
    Systemadministrator
    Tamay Dogan Network
    Debian GNU/Linux Consultant


-- 
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack   Apt. 917                  ICQ #328449886
                   50, rue de Soultz         MSN LinuxMichi
0033/6/61925193    67100 Strasbourg/France   IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)

Attachment: signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: