"Gustavo Franco" <stratus@debian.org> writes: > On 6/12/07, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 04:40:54PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote: >>>>* What do you mean by "switch unstable automatic nature to not >>>> automatic" >>> In a few words, move the 'NotAutomatic: yes' from experimental to >>> unstable and burn experimental. >> So in your opinion, the glibc maintainers should upload glibc 2.6-0exp2 to >> unstable? > Today, no? In a new scenario where unstable isn't automatic? Yes. That idea is so crappy that you should probably be hit over the head with a stick. Each shlib-bumping upload of glibc to unstable means that it needs to transition before all other r-deps can move to testing. Uploading experimental glibcs that are far from ready to unstable is the perfect way to get the release team to quit. Marc -- BOFH #287: Telecommunications is downshifting.
Attachment:
pgpT6OcF7DEmk.pgp
Description: PGP signature