Re: Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).
* Lucas Nussbaum (firstname.lastname@example.org) [070612 23:17]:
> On 12/06/07 at 22:23 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > NO!
> > unstable is meant for packages that should be in the next stable release,
> > as such only packages that are in the maintainer's opinion ready to migrate
> > to testing should be uploaded to unstable.
> Then shouldn't we have a more aggressive policy about removals from
> unstable, for packages that have failed to get into testing during the
> past n months ?
We have that policy, just nobody who does the QA-bits needed to make