Re: Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).
Ter, 2007-06-12 às 23:32 +0200, Vince H&K escreveu:
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 12/06/07 at 22:23 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> >> NO!
> >>
> >> unstable is meant for packages that should be in the next stable release,
> >> as such only packages that are in the maintainer's opinion ready to migrate
> >> to testing should be uploaded to unstable.
> >
> > Then shouldn't we have a more aggressive policy about removals from
> > unstable, for packages that have failed to get into testing during the
> > past n months ?
>
> Actually, I support that. What about a push from unstable to
> experimental when a package fails to behave ? (given reasonable amount
> of time and notice, of course).
>
Also providing apt with an option like apt-get install --reinstall
{oldstable, stable, testing, unstable} would be nice.
experimenting packages from experimental would be easy, and reverting
those test would be also.
> This way, I tend to believe more people would have their eyes on
> experimental, and that might solve some of the problems adressed in this
> thread.
>
> Regards,
>
> Vincent
>
> --
> Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
> http://vincent.fourmond.neuf.fr/
> -- pretty boring signature, isn't it ?
>
>
Reply to: