On Thursday 31 May 2007 19:03:41 Ian Jackson wrote: > (Note that I'm adamantly opposed to the IMO crazy plans to replace the > on-disk status database format. IMO the parsing needs to be sped up > and the Descriptions moved into a separate file. But this is a > discussion for a different list.) along those lines, is there gonna be a dpkg BoF at debconf? i'd be interested to see where this discussion goes. sean
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.