Re: Bug#422423: ITP: libtool-cvs -- Generic library support script - CVS snapshot
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 03:15:03AM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> Do you mean I should just renumber the package version from 2.1a to 1.9 or
> what? I think the versioning schema for this project is very bizzare. Also I
> think it is not so important for experimental packages :)
Actually, it is, unless you want your package to live in experimental
for all eternity if upstream decides that 2.x version numbers suck and
they'll go with 1.x (1.9, 1.10, 1.11, 1.12, ...) for all eternity.
Build a system that even a fool can use, and only a fool will
want to use it.