Re: Bug#422423: ITP: libtool-cvs -- Generic library support script - CVS snapshot
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 03:08:30AM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> Could you explain what you mean? My package is built with libtool
> 2.1a(without dependency on its package) and it went to etch long time
> ago. I
> don't understand why do you want to fill RC bugs for such packages.
I didn't say that I did, I said that *build-depending* on the package would
be an RC bug.
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
> 2007/5/7, Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> >On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 04:19:33PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> * Mike Hommey:
> >> > Why not package this as libtool and upload to experimental ?
> >> It would be impossible to build-depend on it. This may or may not be
> >> a good thing.
> >I don't imagine libtool-cvs is a target for inclusion in lenny, which
> >any package build-depending on it would have an RC bug.