Re: Bug#422423: ITP: libtool-cvs -- Generic library support script - CVS snapshot
Could you explain what you mean? My package is built with libtool 2.1a (without dependency on its package) and it went to etch long time ago. I don't understand why do you want to fill RC bugs for such packages.
2007/5/7, Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 04:19:33PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Mike Hommey:
> > Why not package this as libtool and upload to experimental ?
> It would be impossible to build-depend on it. This may or may not be
> a good thing.
I don't imagine libtool-cvs is a target for inclusion in lenny, which means
any package build-depending on it would have an RC bug.
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
.''`. Piotr Roszatycki
: :' : mailto:Piotr.Roszatycki@gmail.com
`. `' mailto:email@example.com