Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 07:26:35PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: >> binNMUs are done without the bug-report. (It would be rather >> pointless, since the maintainer himself cannot schedule binNMUs on >> Debian's buildds.) > > This sounds inaccurate. binNMUs should still be in response to bugs wherever > applicable, but they should close them unversioned since the BTS tracks > source versions. Though there won't be any bugs *filed* if only binNMUs are needed to fix it as they should be closed manually anyway... A package not being binNMUable is also a bug that should be fixed ofcourse... and which is RC after being binNMUed ;-) Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature