Re: Where did Bacula 1.38.11-7+b1 come from?
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 11:53:23AM -0600, Steve Greenland <steveg@moregruel.net> wrote:
> On 22-Feb-07, 11:00 (CST), Sune Vuorela <nospam@vuorela.dk> wrote:
> > > (This problem was reported in bug #411652)
> > >
> > > I think someone deserves a serious thwacking...
> >
> > Maybe the maintainer for making non-binNMU-safe packages ?
>
> That is so much bullshit. Whoever uploaded the binNMU uploaded broken
> packages. No excuses. End of story.
>
> Now, it may be that the bacula package could be improved to generate
> better results for a binNMU. The proper way to do that is to submit
> bugs, preferably with patches, so that the bacula maintainer can fix
> the source packages. Broken uploads are Not The Right Thing.
Aren't binNMUs autobuilded ?
Mike
Reply to: