Re: Where did Bacula 1.38.11-7+b1 come from?
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 07:28:32PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 11:53:23AM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > On 22-Feb-07, 11:00 (CST), Sune Vuorela <nospam@vuorela.dk> wrote:
> > > > I think someone deserves a serious thwacking...
> > >
> > > Maybe the maintainer for making non-binNMU-safe packages ?
> >
> > That is so much bullshit. Whoever uploaded the binNMU uploaded broken
> > packages.
>
> That would be the buildd. You are aware that buildd-built packages
> aren't usually tested before upload?
Yes. I wasn't aware that buildds ever modify the changelog or do
binNMUs though. Aren't buildds simply there to build the existing
sources on other platforms? Surely some human was involved here?
Reply to: