Re: buildd stuff

[Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>]

Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net> writes:

> Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
>> Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net> writes:
>> 
>>> One first step would be to keep the current build daemons maintainers
>>> (ie the person who signs the upload), and give and access to some
>>> porters to the wanna-build database. This way they could reschedule
>>> failed builds, add dep-wait, or do binNMU. If I am right Steve Langasek
>>> already has access to the wanna-build database of all architectures, so
>>> that should not be a technical problem.
>> 
>> I think from a technical point every buildd admin has access to
>> wanna-build for all architectures. It is just policy not to mess
>> around in someone elses backyard.
>
> You think wrong. Using the public ldap database, you can find the
> following details:
>
> wb-alpha: ajt, rmurray, troup, vorlon
> wb-arm: ajt, rmurray, troup, vorlon
> wb-hppa: ajt, bdale, rmurray, stephen, taggart, tausq, troup, vorlon, willy
> wb-hurd-i386: ajt, jbailey, rmurray
> wb-i386: ajt, rmurray, troup, vorlon
> wb-ia64: ajt, bdale, dsp, koala, rmurray, stephen, taggart, tausq,
> troup, vorlon, willy
> wb-m68k: adconrad, ajt, branden, cts, rmurray, roman, schmitz, smarenka,
> troup, vorlon, waldi, wouter, younie
> wb-mips: ajt, rmurray, vorlon
> wb-ppc: ajt, daenzer, dan, michaelw, rmurray, schmitz, smarenka, troup,
> vorlon
> wb-s390: ajt, cowboy, gt, jr, rmurray, sgybas, vorlon, waldi
> wb-sparc: ajt, bcollins, jbailey, rmurray, troup, vorlon
>
> There is no wb-amd64 nor wb-mipsel. I don't know why.

Iirc amd64 reuses i386 because something run out of groups. And I
guess mipsel is included in mips.

And does w-b actualy enforce this? Are the databases actualy only
readable for the right groups?

MfG
        Goswin