> > However, during that last campaign, many maintainers mentioned me that > > they indeed did *not* receive such notices. > > For my part, this was long ago and because you didn't Cc: > @packages.qa.debian.org back then (IIRC). Yes. During the first campaign (back in October and November), I was only sending mails to <package>@p.d.o At the end of the 1st campaign (December), I began sending to *both* addresses. And, for the 2nd campaign, which I started 10 days ago, I was mailing both addresses since the beginning. > > For instance, yesterday, a notice sent to arb@packages.debian.org, > > arb@packages.qa.debian.org AND directly to Andreas Tille, the package > > maintainer, has only been received once by Andreas. > > He should have received another copy, the arb@packages.debian.org copy, > and I think he will shortly receive it as I'm getting the > packages.debian.org mail backlog that has accumulated since the > beginning of the year right now. I suppose someone saw the problem > mentionned here and went to fix it on puccini.debian.org. This has been unblocked by the admin team, which I mailed about this problem. Joerg Jaspert looked at the mail queue on puccini and noticed that it was completely lagging. I still have no explanation for mails to <package>@packages.qa.debian.org not reaching their destination, though. Maybe they have been unblocked as well, we'll see..:)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature