Re: BTS: Why no "invalid" or "notabug" tag?
On Mon, 04 Dec 2006, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 00:30:40 -0800, Don Armstrong <email@example.com> wrote:
> >On Mon, 04 Dec 2006, Marc Haber wrote:
> >Blocking has been documented for quite some time:
> >revision 1.54
> >date: 2006-07-13 15:14:12 -0700; author: joeyh; state: Exp; lines: +7 -0
> >document block/unblock
> The important information (which file was modified) is missing here.
Heh. I thought that much was obvious; clearly I've been looking at
debbugs for too long.
$ GET http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control|grep block
<dt><code>block</code> <var>bugnumber</var> <code>by</code> <var>bug</var> ...
<dd>Note that the fix for the first bug is blocked by the other listed bugs.
<dt><code>unblock</code> <var>bugnumber</var> <code>by</code> <var>bug</var> ...
<dd>Note that the fix for the first bug is no longer blocked by the other
[It's a control command, so it's documented in server-control.wml]
I leave the show floor, but not before a pack of caffeinated Jolt gum
is thrust at me by a hyperactive girl screaming, "Chew more! Do more!"
The American will to consume more and produce more personified in a
stick of gum. I grab it.
-- Chad Dickerson