On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 18:13 +0100, Matthias.Beier.Gronau@gmx.de wrote: > 1. /bin/sh can be a symbolic link to any shell. This can't be right. For example, it obviously can't be a link to /bin/csh. So since it can be a symbolic link to *some* shells and not others, telling maintainers "you know which ones we mean, wink wink" isn't any good. But the rest of your proposal speaks of some kind of standard functionality. If that functionality can be specified in such a way that it is of practical value to maintainers (and "posix-compliant" is not), then I'm all for it. Thomas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part