Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 10/25/06 21:42, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:21:39AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> On 10/25/06 06:27, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>> Ron Johnson a écrit :
>>>> On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>>>>> * Ron Johnson <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2006-10-25 04:36]:
>>> For m68k and hurd, I have sent a mail to the porters a few months ago, I
>>> haven't received any answer. Maybe we should have to drop those
>>> architectures, at least temporarily.
>> m68k was dropped from Etch last week. :(
> When Sarge was released, amd64 was not officially released but had an
> unofficial release. why not do the same with the hopes tha etch+1 will
> see m68k in relase shape?
If I read the (extended) thread correctly, they're going to do
exactly that: keep m68k on Sid, and do unofficial Etch releases.
There's a *huge* thread cross-posted to d-m68k and d-release that
hashes thru the whole thing.
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----