Re: Bug mass filling
Gabor Gombas <email@example.com> writes:
> How about instead of speaking about POSIX, policy should just list the
> shells that are officially supported as /bin/sh? There is no need
> listing every shell, just a representative subset: bash (obviously),
> dash (it's popular) and an other "minimalistic" shell (posh?) to prevent
> allowing everything & the kitchen sink if dash starts to rapidly acquire
> new features.
You could say the script _should_ be POSIX compliant and _must_ work
with bash, dash, ash...